On August 5, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission approved its final “Pay Ratio Disclosure” rules as mandated by the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act. The final rules require annual disclosure of the ratio of a reporting company’s principal executive officer’s total annual compensation to the median of the total annual compensation of all its employees. Most public companies will be required to make the pay ratio disclosure following their first full fiscal year beginning on or after January 1, 2017. Specifically, for a calendar-year reporting company, the first pay ratio disclosure must be made in the proxy statement for its 2018 annual meeting.
Under the final rules a company must disclose:
the CEO’s annual total compensation (no change in the method of calculation);
the median employee’s annual total compensation; and,
the ratio of these two amounts.
A company must calculate the median employee’s annual total compensation in accordance with existing SEC executive compensation disclosure rules.
The pay ratio disclosure may be expressed as a ratio or as a multiple. The disclosure is required only for the last completed fiscal year. A company must also briefly describe the methodology used to identify the median employee and any material estimates, adjustments or assumptions used in determining the ratio.
A company may determine its median employee by analyzing all full-time, part-time, seasonal, and temporary workers it employs and any of its consolidated subsidiaries as of a date it selects within the last three months of its fiscal year. However, companies are not permitted to make full-time equivalent adjustments for part-time employees or to include annualized adjustments for temporary and seasonal workers. When selecting the median employee, companies may, but are not required to, annualize the total compensation for permanent employees who did not work a full year, such as new hires.
A company may choose a method to identify the median employee based on its own facts and circumstances and may use either its total population of employees or a statistical sample of that population.
The rules allow certain additional computational flexibility, permitting companies to:
use the same median employee for the three most recent fiscal years unless there has been a change in the employee population or compensation arrangements that would significantly impact the calculation;
exclude certain non-U.S. employees from the calculation where foreign data privacy laws prevent companies from obtaining such information;
exclude up to 5% of non-U.S. employees, provided that all employees in a particular jurisdiction are excluded; and,
make cost-of-living adjustments when identifying the median employee and in calculating the median employee’s annual total compensation.
The rules do not apply to smaller reporting companies, foreign private issuers, or emerging growth companies.
Jim Kennedy practices in the Business Representation & Transactions Group. The focus of his practice is corporate, securities, and financing law, where he has extensive experience in mergers, acquisitions and ...
Mark Reuter advocates for business clients in transactions, proceedings and conflicts regulated by federal and state securities laws and stock exchange rules. A partner in the firm’s Business Representation & Transaction ...
As a partner in the firm’s Business Representation & Transactions Group, Allie Westfall’s insight and proven analytical skills help translate the complexities of the often-challenging securities laws. Allie’s counsel ...
- Securities Law
- Securities Regulation
- Cybersecurity and Privacy Law
- Corporate Law
- Tax Planning
- Corporate Tax
- Paycheck Protection Program
- JOBS Act
- FAST Act
- Proxy Access Rules
- Securities Litigation
- Consumer Protection Act
- SEC Enforcement
- Corporate Governance
- Private Offerings
- Real Estate Law
- Conflict Minerals
- Emerging Growth Companies
- Ohio LLC Act
- Intellectual Property
- Pay Ratio Disclosure
- Opportunity Zone
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Accredited Investors
- Sales Tax
- United States Supreme Court
- Online Trading Platforms
- Registration Statement
- Executive Compensation
- Health Care Act
- Annual Reports
- Ohio Foreclosure Reform
- Family-Controlled Entities
- Gift and Estate Transfers
- Director Compensation
- Wall Street Reform
- Board of Directors
- Director Independence
- Clawback Rules
- Total Shareholder Return
- Cyber Insurance
- Data Breach
- Receivership Statute
- Regulation A
- Regulation D
- Compensation Committee Certification
- CDFI Fund
- Community Development Entities
- Community Development Financial Institutions Fund
- Government Shutdown
- New Markets Tax Credit
- NMTC Financing
- Regulation Fair Disclosure
- Social Media
- Healthcare Reform
- Public Company Transition Rules
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Tax Credit
- Beware of ‘Spring-Loaded’ Awards: SEC Issues Updated Accounting Guidance
- SEC Opens Floodgates for ESG Proposals
- NYSE Proposes an Amendment to the Shareholder Voting Requirement
- SEC Charges Pearson plc for Misleading Investors About Cyber Breach and Inadequate Disclosure Controls
- Update: SEC Postpones Decision on Nasdaq's New Listing Rules to Advance Board Diversity
- SEC Charges AT&T and Three Executives with Regulation FD Violations
- Stimulus Package Reverses IRS’s Position on Deductibility of PPP Expenses and Other Loan Forgiveness Issues
- Nasdaq Proposes New Listing Rules to Advance Board Diversity: Comply or Explain
- More Disclosure Modernization: SEC Adopts Significant Amendments to Financial Disclosure Rules
- SEC Eases Limits and Rules on Private Offerings