Institutional Investor Services (ISS) recently announced that it will be launching GRId 2.0 on February 20, 2012. GRId, or Governance Risk Indicators, is ISS’s rating system for publicly-traded companies’ corporate governance practices which ISS wants us to believe is designed to measure publicly-traded companies’ governance-related risk. GRId purports to be based upon ISS’s proxy voting policy guidelines.
Certain features of GRId will stay the same. ISS will continue to evaluate in the four categories of Audit, Board, Compensation and Shareholder Rights in metrics of “Low Concern,” “Medium Concern” and “High Concern.” However, ISS uses GRId 2.0 as an opportunity to change its scoring methodology. ISS is adding new questions on its pay-for-performance methodology based on its newly-published whitepaper, related-party transactions, board relationships and takeover defenses. Companies should expect to receive a numerical GRId score for each of the categories in addition to a level of concern.
ISS’s Pay-for-Performance Whitepaper outlines ISS’s latest approach effective February 1, 2012, to evaluating pay-for-performance. This is the primary method ISS uses in deciding whether to recommend for or against a company’s say-on-pay vote and for or against a proposal related to an equity compensation plan. The latest approach is based upon the alignment between CEO pay and one and three year total shareholder return (“TSR”) within a subject company’s peer group (as designated by ISS, not the company) and between CEO pay and five year TSR of the subject company.
If you have any questions about how GRId 2.0 will affect your company’s corporate governance rating or about ISS’s Pay-for-Performance methodology, please contact us.
This blog post was updated on December 21, 2011
- Partner
Mark Reuter advocates for business clients in transactions, proceedings and conflicts regulated by federal and state securities laws and stock exchange rules. A partner in the firm’s Business Representation & Transaction ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Securities Law
- SEC
- Securities Regulation
- Cybersecurity and Privacy Law
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Coronavirus
- Economic Sanctions
- Ohio LLC Act
- Cybersecurity Regulation
- Nasdaq
- Corporate Law
- Tax Planning
- Corporate Tax
- Paycheck Protection Program
- Dodd-Frank
- IRS
- JOBS Act
- FAST Act
- Proxy Access Rules
- Securities Litigation
- Consumer Protection Act
- Corporate Governance
- SEC Enforcement
- Crowdfunding
- Cryptocurrency
- Taxation
- Hedging
- Private Offerings
- Real Estate Law
- Conflict Minerals
- Emerging Growth Companies
- Investors
- Pay Ratio Disclosure
- Intellectual Property
- Technology
- Whistleblower
- Opportunity Zone
- LIBOR
- Accredited Investors
- Sales Tax
- United States Supreme Court
- Online Trading Platforms
- IPO
- Registration Statement
- Executive Compensation
- Health Care Act
- Annual Reports
- Ohio Foreclosure Reform
- Director Compensation
- Family-Controlled Entities
- Gift and Estate Transfers
- Wall Street Reform
- Board of Directors
- Director Independence
- Clawback Rules
- Total Shareholder Return
- Cyber Insurance
- Data Breach
- Lenders
- Receivership Statute
- Regulation A
- Regulation D
- Compensation Committee Certification
- Government Shutdown
- CDEs
- CDFI Fund
- Community Development Entities
- Community Development Financial Institutions Fund
- New Markets Tax Credit
- NMTC
- NMTC Financing
- Regulation Fair Disclosure
- Social Media
- Benefits
- Healthcare Reform
- Litigation
- Marketing
- Public Company Transition Rules
- Tax Credit
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
Recent Posts
- SEC Provides Sample Guidance on Disclosure of Russia-Ukraine Invasion
- Proposed SEC Climate-Related Disclosure Requirements
- Proposed SEC Cybersecurity Rules
- International Unrest and its Impact on M&A
- The United States Ramps Up Severe Economic Sanctions on Russia and Export Controls
- Revised Ohio LLC Statute
- Beware of ‘Spring-Loaded’ Awards: SEC Issues Updated Accounting Guidance
- SEC Opens Floodgates for ESG Proposals
- NYSE Proposes an Amendment to the Shareholder Voting Requirement
- SEC Charges Pearson plc for Misleading Investors About Cyber Breach and Inadequate Disclosure Controls