At a meeting on July 9, 2012 the Financial Accounting Standards Board voted that it would not move forward with its outstanding project for modifying disclosure requirements for loss contingencies. In concluding to remove the project from its agenda, the Board noted that the current requirements under Disclosure of Certain Loss Contingencies and Contingencies (Topic 450): Disclosure of Certain Loss Contingencies are sufficient, and that addressing any concerns with the adequacy of loss contingency disclosures is an issue of compliance and enforcement rather than standard-setting. FASB’s July 2008 Topic 450 exposure draft, as revised by the July 2010 exposure draft, generated a substantial number of comment letters.
- Partner
Mark Reuter advocates for business clients in transactions, proceedings and conflicts regulated by federal and state securities laws and stock exchange rules. A partner in the firm’s Business Representation & Transactions ...
Topics/Tags
Select- Securities Law
- SEC
- Securities Regulation
- Corporate Transparency Act
- Cybersecurity and Privacy Law
- Nasdaq
- Corporate Law
- Clawback Rules
- Coronavirus
- IRS
- Regulation Fair Disclosure
- Government Shutdown
- Tax Planning
- SEC Enforcement
- Dodd-Frank
- Cybersecurity Regulation
- House Settlement
- NCAA
- NIL
- Sports
- Taxation
- Mergers & Acquisitions
- Paycheck Protection Program
- JOBS Act
- Corporate Governance
- EDGAR
- EDGAR Next
- Consumer Protection Act
- FAST Act
- Corporate Tax
- Proxy Access Rules
- Economic Sanctions
- Securities Litigation
- Ohio LLC Act
- Crowdfunding
- Conflict Minerals
- Cryptocurrency
- Hedging
- Real Estate Law
- Emerging Growth Companies
- Investors
- Pay Ratio Disclosure
- Whistleblower
- Private Offerings
- Intellectual Property
- Technology
- Executive Compensation
- Health Care Act
- LIBOR
- Opportunity Zone
- Wall Street Reform
- Accredited Investors
- Sales Tax
- United States Supreme Court
- Online Trading Platforms
- IPO
- Registration Statement
- Annual Reports
- Director Compensation
- Family-Controlled Entities
- Gift and Estate Transfers
- Ohio Foreclosure Reform
- Board of Directors
- Director Independence
- Cyber Insurance
- Data Breach
- Lenders
- Receivership Statute
- Regulation A
- Regulation D
- Total Shareholder Return
- Compensation Committee Certification
- CDEs
- CDFI Fund
- Community Development Entities
- Community Development Financial Institutions Fund
- New Markets Tax Credit
- NMTC
- NMTC Financing
- Social Media
- Benefits
- Healthcare Reform
- Litigation
- Marketing
- Public Company Transition Rules
- Employment Incentives
- HIRE Act
- Social Security Tax
- Tax Credit
Recent Posts
- No More No-Action: SEC Permanently Discontinues Responses to Rule 14a-8 Shareholder Proposal No-Action Requests
- SEC Moves to Formally Rescind Climate Disclosure Rules
- SEC Proposes Rules to Permit Optional Semiannual Reporting
- Proxy Season Update: SEC will not respond to Most Shareholder Proposal No-action Requests
- Reg FD Compliance Reminder – Influencer Interview Triggers 8-K Filing
- What Filers Should Know as Government Shutdown Looms
- Ninth Circuit Warning: Silence in the Face of SEC Comment Letters May Bolster Section 12(a)(2) Claims
- House Settlement Approved: College Sports Transition into a New but Familiar Legal Era
- Checking the Box(es): SEC Issues New Guidance Clarifying Clawback Expectations
- Pay vs. Performance and Cybersecurity Disclosure Rules: Will the SEC Retract Rulemaking?
