In a case featuring a heated pretrial-discovery battle between heavyweights, a U.S. District Court Magistrate Judge in Tennessee recently approved the use of predictive coding in reviewing over two million documents for responsiveness. Noting that he was “allowing Plaintiff to switch horses in midstream,” the Magistrate Judge in Bridgestone Americas, Inc. v. International Business Machines Corp., 2014 BL 217053, No. 3:13-cv-01196 (M. D. Tenn., 7/22/14), permitted “Plaintiff to use predictive coding on the documents that they have previously identified, based on search terms Defendant provided.” Endorsing the use of predictive coding, the Magistrate Judge reasoned,
Predictive coding is a rapidly developing field in which the Sedona Conference has devoted a good deal of time and effort to, and has provided various best practices suggestions. Magistrate Judge Peck has written an excellent article on the subject and has issued opinions concerning predictive coding. Certainly, this Magistrate Judge could try to write an extensive opinion, going into various cases which have allowed and denied predictive coding. In the final analysis, the uses of predictive coding is a judgment call, hopefully keeping in mind the exhortation of Rule 26 that discovery be tailored by the court to be as efficient and cost-effective as possible. In this case, we are talking about millions of documents to be reviewed with costs likewise in the millions. There is no single, simple, correct solution possible under these circumstances.
In challenging Bridgestone’s proposed use of predictive coding, IBM described it as being “an unwarranted change in the original case management order” and “unfair to use predictive coding after an initial screening has been done with search terms.” The Magistrate Judge succinctly overruled those objections, referring to IBM as “a sophisticated user of advanced methods for integrating and reviewing large amounts of data,” even though IBM presently is “not offering predictive coding as part of its products.”
- Senior Partner
Bob Maxwell has represented management in all areas of labor and employment law for more than 50 years. He has extensive experience in labor negotiations, arbitrations, employment law litigation in federal and state courts and ...
Blog Contact: Joseph Callow, Litigation Partner
jcallow@kmklaw.com or 513.579.6419
Topics/Tags
Select- Coronavirus
- Class Action Litigation
- Litigation
- Cybersecurity and Privacy Law
- Data Breach
- Securities Law
- Supreme Court
- E-Discovery
- Intellectual Property
- Social Media
- Trademark
- Trademark Litigation
- Sixth Circuit
- Initial Coin Offering
- Antitrust
- Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
- Bet-the-Company Litigation
- E-Discovery Case Law
- Electronic Data Discovery
- Employment Law
- Workplace Accommodations
- ESI
- GDPR
- General Data Protection Regulation
- Cryptocurrency
- Employer Policies
- Labor & Employment Law
- Labor Law
- SEC
- Securities Litigation
- Technology
- ERISA
- Stock Drop
- Ascertainability
- Drug Enforcement Agency
- Medical Marijuana
- Ohio Foreclosure Reform
- Cybersecurity Regulation
- Craft Brewing
- Copyright Law
- Environmental Law
- Fair Housing Act
- Health Care Act
- Healthcare Reform
- Pregnancy Discrimination
- Religion Discrimination
- Seventh Circuit
- Electronically Stored Information
- Proportionality
- Accommodation
- Americans with Disabilities Act
- EEOC
- FLSA
- Telecommuting
- Cyber Insurance
- Lenders
- Receivership Statute
- Business Process Improvement
- Employment Litigation
- Employer Handbook
- Employer Rules
- National Labor Relations Act
- National Labor Relations Board
- NLRB
- Unions
- Predictive Coding
- TAR ( Technology Assisted Review)
- E-Discovery Project Plan
- Evidence
- Quality Representation
- Subpoena
- Arbitration
- CAFA
- Land Use & Zoning
- Construction Litigation
- Privacy
- Statute of Limitations
- Taxation
- Federal Rule
Recent Posts
- Questioning the Questionnaires: New PPP-Related Litigation Raises Issues for Borrowers
- "You Don't Have to Go Home But You Can't Stay Here": Updates to Ohio and Kentucky’s COVID-19 Orders Impacting Bars & Restaurants
- Kentucky Restaurants Begin Opening with Limited Capacity Amid COVID-19 Epidemic
- Ohio Restaurants and Bars Begin Soft Openings for Diners Amid COVID-19 Epidemic
- Supreme Court Sidesteps “Cy Pres” Challenge
- Golfers, New and Old - Be Careful!
- "Aloha Poke": Social Media and Consumer Perception are Part of the Trademark Enforcement Equation
- GDPR: Less Than 100 Day and Counting to "G-Day" - Here's What You Need to Know
- Rapid SEC Action Against AriseBank Reveals New Playbook For Allegedly Fraudulent ICOs
- Giga Watt ICO Faces Tezos-like Securities Litigation Challenge